Lippincott’s Evidence-Based Practice Network
The results were not surprising; there was no research evidence to support the use of aspiration in giving I.M. or subcutaneous injections. The researchers recommended the following for consideration:
- Aspiration is not indicated for subcutaneous injections of immunizations, heparin, and insulin
- Aspiration is not indicated for I.M. injections of vaccines and immunizations
- Aspiration may be indicated for I.M. injections of medications such as penicillin
- Until a standard can be established, injection techniques must be individualized to the patient to prevent incorrect needle placement (Crawford & Johnson, 2012).
Unfortunately in nursing, we often practice a certain way because that is the way it has always been done. I applaud the work of the researchers who did this study; they are truly moving nursing practice forward based on evidence. Translating evidence into practice is a series of steps and the researchers have taken the first steps to appraise the evidence and recommend practice changes based on the evidence. It is up to each of us to take the evidence presented and integrate it into practice.
Crawford, C., Johnson, J. (2012). To aspirate or not: An integrative review of the evidence. Nursing2012 (42)3,20-25.